Reasons not to make use Of Google > 자유게시판

To keep away from leading other folks astray, https://fetishbreak.com/ please do not check with movies utilizing the host identify youtube.com or its aliases. Instead, make a link to invidio.us or one of the related proxy websites. Lead people to what is sweet, not to what's bad! Just be certain not to decide on a proxy that is "protected" by Cloudflare, since that sends its own nonfree software. This manner of referring might be fail-protected: it could cease to work, however it is going to probably not start main people to run nonfree software. There is also a Firefox add-on to bypass that Javascript code. IceCat comes with that add-on by default. But that won't overcome the blockage of entry through Tor. If Google defeats the invidio.us proxies, I can ell you ways I cannot respond. I can't surrender to youtube's nonfree software program and surveillance. I get pleasure from gaining access to the music and video there, but I can't do foolish or determined things to keep that access. You should not either! You don't want a special "platform" to publish an audio or video on the internet. You possibly can put up an audio or video file on any net site. Just put the file on the site and link to it as if it had been an peculiar page. All graphical browsers can handle that.Google censored set up of Samsung's ad-blocker, saying that blocking ads is "interference" with the sites that publicize (and surveil users by means of advertisements). The advert-blocker is proprietary software, similar to the program (Google Play) that Google used to deny access to put in it. I would refuse to have both of them on my pc. Using a nonfree program gives the owner energy over you, and Google has exercised that energy.

Surveillance

To establish yourself to a Google service is a grave error. - Google stores a list of all purchases a user has made that in any method point out the person's a gmail account. A user can delete purchases from this checklist, however only one buy at a time. Then that purchase disappears from the listing that the user sees. Whether it remains in another list, we have no idea, but I'd expect Google to answer that query with doubletalk. The article talks about what Google cites as its motive for doing this, however the motive is irrelevant - as a result of it's not an excuse.- Google's alarm system, "Nest Secure", turns out to have contained a microphone all alongside - however solely just lately started listening.- Google "sanitizes" its total search logs, then publishes them; but it surely declines to describe the process of "sanitization", and there's proof that customers could be tracked by way of them.

The article additionally mentions two-issue authentication, which in and of itself could possibly be a helpful method (though I've read that crackers can now defeat it), however has the flaw of requiring a cell phone. My rule #2 for digital safety is not to have a mobile phone.

- Gmail was deliberate from the start as a large surveillance system, to make psychological profiles not solely of Gmail customers however of everyone who sends mail to Gmail customers.- Google quietly combined its ad-tracking profiles with its shopping profiles.- Google has found a manner to trace most bank card purchases in the US, even those not accomplished through a telephone, and correlate that with people's online actions.

Google can't do either facet to me, since I pay cash and do not carry a cell phone, and it would not know what websites I take a look at.

- Google Play sends app builders the personal particulars of customers that set up the app. Merely asking customers' "consent" for this isn't sufficient to legitimize that. We all know that the majority customers have given up on studying simply what they're "consenting" to, and the reason is that they are accustomed to being advised, "If you would like to make use of this service, you could consent to blah blah blah." To truly protect people's privateness, we must cease Google (and different corporations) from getting this private data in the primary place!- Google shops an enormous quantity of knowledge on every consumer. This will embody, in addition to the person's search historical past and advertising profile: - A timeline of the consumer's location all through every day- Data on the utilization of non-Google phone apps- 'Deleted' emails and information uploaded to Google Drive

Facebook and Google joined with ISPs to defeat a privacy initiative in California. Collecting the some ways Google is concerned with US authorities surveillance, abroad and in the US, amounts to quite a bundle.

Google invitations folks to let Google monitor their phone use, and all web use in their properties, for an extravagant payment of $20.

This malicious performance is just not a secondary side of a program with some other function; this is the software program's sole objective, and Google says so. But Google says it in a way that encourages most people to ignore the main points and stay unaware of the extent of the spying. Anyway, mere consent doesn't legitimize massive surveillance.

Amazon and Google want "smart" gadgets to report all exercise to them.

In other phrases, when you've got a "sensible" (read "spy") lightbulb with that proposed function, and inform an Amazon or Google listening machine about it, thenceforth any time you switched it on or off regardless of how, it will ship a report to Amazon or Google.

Even right now, the one way to make "sensible" merchandise protected is to ensure they can't connect with anybody else's systems.

Another piece of Google's surveillance capitalism: when shops mail receipts to a gmail.com account, Google figures out and records who bought what.

I feel that the shop itself mustn't get this data, which is why I all the time pay cash and never give my identify.

*Google faces lawsuit over tracking in apps even when users opted out.*

- Google cuts off accounts for customers that resell Pixel telephones. They lose access to all of their mail and paperwork stored in Google servers beneath that account. It should be illegal to place any "terms of service" on a bodily product. It should also be unlawful to shut an account on a service with out letting the user obtain whatever was stored there. These occasions present one other purpose why schools must by no means ask a student to use a service account linked to the scholar's name.

Censorship

- Amazon and Google have reduce off area-fronting, a feature used to allow individuals in tyrannical countries to achieve communication programs which might be banned there.- French blogger Claims YouTube Tried to Censor Juncker Interview.- Google has agreed to perform special censorship of Youtube for the government of Pakistan, deleting views that the state opposes. This will help the illiberal Pakistani state suppress dissent.

- Youtube's "content ID" automatically deletes posted movies in a way copyright legislation doesn't require.- YouTube has made non-public deals with the copyright industry to censor works that are honest use. More info.

- Google shut off Alexa O'Brien's Google Drive account, denying her entry to it, because her reporting on Chelsea Manning's trial included copies of al-Qa'ida propaganda that was offered as proof.- Google is deleting porn artists' porn videos from their own private accounts, quietly and mysteriously.

Never belief a remote storage company to maintain anything however a spare backup copy. Whenever you retailer that, put your files into an archive and encrypt it so that the corporate can't inform what's in them - not even their file names.

- Vox lawyers bought Youtube to take down criticisms of a video published by Vox, and threaten the critics with punishment, too.

The movies had been almost certainly honest use, however Youtube determined in opposition to the critics anyway. This reveals how Youtube's normal submission to the copyright business constrict's people's rights.

Miscellaneous

- Google is a tax dodger. Of course, it isn't the only one, but that is not any excuse.- Google helps the TPP because of three principally-evil provisions that would benefit Google.- Google has made it so that Chrome now robotically installs the DRM module. This makes it dangerous for security researchers within the US to investigate doable insecurity in Chrome. More data.- Support is growing for reverting US antitrust regulation to what it was before Reagan weakened it. That's the reason Google is using its affect to weaken those who campaign in opposition to this.

How I Got Fired From a D.C. Think Tank for Fighting Against the ability of Google.

- Google told a reporter in 2011 that websites without "+1" buttons could be punished with lower search rankings. When she printed a narrative in Forbes about that, Google pressured Forbes to take it down.